| |
|
Cultic Studies Journal
|
The
Council of Europe's Report on Sects and New Religious Movements
|
|
Psychological
Manipulation and Society: cults, cult groups, new religious movements
|
Cultic Studies Journal
Psychological Manipulation and Society
Vol. 9, No. 1, 1992
3/8
The
Council of Europe's Report on Sects and New Religious Movements
5. The Legal Status of Sects in Council of Europe Member
States
In general, there is no special legal status for sects;
they are protected by (constitutional or statutory) provisions guaranteeing freedom of
conscience and religion. The separation of church and state also guarantees state
neutrality towards both religions and sects, in countries such as France.
In that country, most sects take the form of
nonprofit-making associations (under the Act of 1 July 1901, which normally exempts them
from any form of supervision). This means that they are not subject to taxation.
Switzerland does not normally accord them the status
of public law corporations.
Iceland makes it a condition that associations must
be registered before they can enjoy rights. There are at present 12 registered religious
associations.
In the United Kingdom, religious associations may
set up tax-exempt charitable trusts if they match one of the classifications defined by
law. The public authorities support an organization called INFORM, which was set up to
provide objective information on the true identity and nature of sects.
In Finland, sects or new religious movements are
free to act once they have been registered as religious communities. Their articles of
association are examined to ensure conformity with the law.
There is no special status in Belgium. Associations
may exist in various legal forms: public interest bodies or nonprofit-making societies,
for example.
The Spanish Parliament adopted a report on sects in
February 1989, in which it made a number of recommendations to the government. Its
recommendations are that the authorities should:
- monitor compliance with law;
-
- supervise application of the statutes of organizations
applying for registration;
-
- study and adopt any amendments needed to the legal system,
especially as regards nonprofit bodies and charities, in order to facilitate supervision
of their financial and fiscal affairs;
-
- circulate information to magistrates, judges, and tax
authorities on violations of individual liberties;
-
- provide specialized information concerning the prevention
and reporting of offenses committed by sects;
-
- draw up and apply very strict criteria for granting
subsidies, particularly to rehabilitation centers;
-
- appoint guardians for minors, especially those abandoned by
parents who have joined sects which may prevent them from fully exercising their parental
authority and providing their children with the necessary care;
-
- ratify international agreements on the abduction of minors
and generally disseminate information on sects.
-
The other member states refer to freedom of religion or to
freedom of conscience and worship.
6. Restrictions on the Activities of Sects in Council of
Europe Member States, and Sanctions Applied
The delegations' answers to the questionnaire paint a
fairly uniform picture: generally, there are no special restrictions on the activities of
sects, which are protected by the principles of freedom of conscience and religion.
Potential restrictions are thus the same as those which apply to that freedom.
Belgium, Switzerland, Denmark, France,
Ireland, Luxembourg, and Liechtenstein make compliance with public
policy (ordre public) a condition. Public decency and/or morals must be respected
in Belgium, Switzerland, Denmark, Finland, the United
Kingdom, and Ireland.
Some countries impose other conditions:
- Switzerland indicates that public policy (ordre
public) covers security, tranquility, public health and morals, and good faith in
business transactions; and that the restrictions needed to protect public policy apply to
spoken and written propaganda, hawking or peddling and collections. Some forms of
religious therapy are forbidden.
-
- Conformity with the law is a condition in Belgium, Finland,
Luxembourg, Liechtenstein, and Norway. Presumably, this also applies
even in countries which have not expressly said so.
-
- In Cyprus, all religions whose teaching or rites are
not secret may operate freely.
-
- In Spain, the severest sanction is being declared
unlawful; banning is provided for in Finland and Switzerland.
7. Case-Law on Sects
The delegations' replies indicate that there is very little
case-law on sects.
- Portugal points out, for example, that there can be
no case-law on the activities of sects, in view of the declaration on the elimination of
all forms of intolerance and discrimination based on religious or other convictions.
-
- It does, however, speak of proceedings at present under way
concerning the refusal of certain Jehovah's Witnesses to perform military service or, in
some cases, alternative community service.
-
- Norway speaks of accusations brought against the Church of
Scientology, whose recruiting and funding methods are criticized.
-
- Spain speaks of several cases, such as unlawful
proselytism, duress, threats, offenses against individual freedom and safety, fraud, tax
evasion, currency fraud, and employment offenses.
-
- The United Kingdom speaks above all of disputes
concerning tax exemptions granted to charitable associations.
- The courts in France have had to deal with complaints
both from sects themselves and from individuals -- relatives of members or former members
-- complaining of certain aspects of their activities.
-
Sects or their members base their complaints either on
defamation or the exercise of freedom of religion.
Defamation is alleged when information on sects is
published (see, for example, the judgment of 10 November 1982 of the Paris Regional Court,
quoted in Les Petites Affiches of 27 April 1988). Some sects conceal
their true activities or aims behind a cultural, philosophical, or other facade, and
accordingly regard any information on their true activities as defamatory,
In the case referred to, the court, having compared the
documents issued by the sect itself with the claims made in the article complained of,
concluded that those claims were true.
This brings us to one of the elements that distinguish a
sect from a religion. While a religion implies free, informed consent on the part of those
who join it, people joining certain sects may be free when they join it, but are not
informed, and, once they are informed, they are usually no longer free.
As the father of one victim bitterly remarked, sects
usually succeed because they advance undercover.
Another ground for complaints by members of sects concerns
the exercise of freedom of religion. Thus, the European Commission on Human Rights has had
to deal with several cases concerning the practice of religion by sects or some of their
members. (See, inter alia: Case 7805/77, 5 May 1979, Vol. XXII, p. 244; Case
2299/64, Vol. VIII, p. 324; Case 7705/76; Case 8282/78 of July 14 1980, D.R. 21, p. 109.)
All these complaints were declared unfounded, since they concerned specific practices
beyond the reach of law and were thus covered by paragraph 2 of Article 9 of the European
Convention on Human Rights. This paragraph provides for restrictions on freedom of
religion, provided that these restrictions are prescribed by law and are necessary in a
democratic society in the interests of public safety, for the protection of public order,
health, or morals, or for the protection of the rights and freedoms of others.
And here we come to the nub of the whole problem of sects,
namely, the fact that they lie at the point where the balance between freedom (either
individual or collective) and public order is upset.
The concept of public order is extremely hard to define,
this being a highly subjective and variable notion, on which states enjoy considerable
discretion.
This leads us to start thinking about sects as minorities.
We must not forget that the main religions are legitimized in individual states by being
mass religions (they were once state religions, and still are in some countries) and that
the religious observances which they generate are imposed on the minority as a cultural
phenomenon.
|