Cult FormationRobert J. Lifton, M.D.
John Jay College The Harvard Mental Health Letter
Volume 7, Number 8 February 1981,
reprinted in AFF News Vol. 2 No. 5, 1996
Abstract
Cults represent one aspect of a worldwide epidemic of ideological totalism, or fundamentalism. They tend to be associated with a charismatic leader, thought reform, and exploitation of members. Among the methods of thought reform commonly
used by cults are milieu control, mystical manipulation, the demand for purity, a cult of confession, sacred science, loading the language, doctrine over person, and dispensing of existence. The current historical context of dislocation from organizing symbolic structures, decaying
belief systems concerning religion, authority, marriage, family, and death, and a "protean style" of continuous psychological experimentation with the self is conducive to the growth of cults. The use of coercion, as in certain forms of "deprogramming," to deal with the restrictions of
individual liberty associated with cults is inconsistent with the civil rights tradition. Yet legal intervention may be indicated when specific laws are broken.
Two main concerns should inform our moral and psychological
perspective on cults: the dangers of ideological totalism, or what I would also call
fundamentalism; and the need to protect civil liberties.
There is now a worldwide epidemic of totalism and
fundamentalism in forms that are political, religious or both. Fundamentalism is a
particular danger in this age of nuclear weapons, because it often includes a theology of
Armageddon--a final battle between good and evil. I have studied Chinese thought reform in
the 1950s as well as related practices in McCarthyite American politics and in certain
training and educational programs. I have also examined these issues in work with Vietnam
veterans, who often movingly rejected war related totalism; and more recently in a study
of the psychology of Nazi doctors.
Certain psychological themes which recur in these various
historical contexts also arise in the study of cults. Cults can be identified by three
characteristics:
- a charismatic leader who increasingly becomes an object of
worship as the general principles that may have originally sustained the group lose their
power;
- a process I call coercive persuasion or thought reform;
- economic, sexual, and other exploitation of group members by
the leader and the ruling coterie.
Milieu Control
The first method characteristically used by ideological totalism is milieu control: the
control of all communication within a given environment. In such an environment individual
autonomy becomes a threat to the group. There is an attempt to manage an individual's
inner communication. Milieu control is maintained and expressed by intense group process,
continuous psychological pressure, and isolation by geographical distance, unavailability
of transportation, or even physical restraint. Often the group creates an increasingly
intense sequence of events such as seminars, lectures and encounters which makes leaving
extremely difficult, both physically and psychologically. Intense milieu control can
contribute to a dramatic change of identity which I call doubling: the formation of a
second self which lives side by side with the former one, often for a considerable time.
When the milieu control is lifted, elements of the earlier self may be reasserted.
Creating a Pawn
A second characteristic of totalistic environments is mystical manipulation or planned
spontaneity. This is a systematic process through which the leadership can create in cult
members what I call the psychology of the pawn. The process is managed so that it appears
to arise spontaneously; to its objects it rarely feels like manipulation. Religious
techniques such as fasting, chanting and limited sleep are used. Manipulation may take on
a special intense quality in a cult for which a particular chosen' human being is the only
source of salvation. The person of the leader may attract members to the cult, but can
also be a source of disillusionment. If members of the Unification Church, for example,
come to believe that Sun Myung Moon, its founder, is associated with the Korean Central
Intelligence Agency, they may lose their faith. Mystical manipulation may also legitimate
deception of outsiders, as in the "heavenly deception" of the Unification
Church and analogous practices in other cult environments. Anyone who has not
seen the light and therefore lives in the realm of evil can be justifiably deceived for a
higher purpose. For instance, collectors of funds may be advised to deny their affiliation
with a cult that has a dubious public reputation.
Purity and Confession
Two other features of totalism are a demand for purity and a cult of
confession. The demand for purity is a call for radical separation of good and evil within
the environment and within oneself. Purification is a continuing process, often
institutionalized in the cult of confession, which enforces conformity through guilt and
shame evoked by mutual criticism and self-criticism in small groups.
Confessions contain varying mixtures of revelation and
concealment. As Albert Camus observed, "Authors of confessions write especially to
avoid confession, to tell nothing of what they know." Young cult members confessing
the sins of their precultic lives may leave out ideas and feelings that they are not aware
of or reluctant to discuss, including a continuing identification with their prior
existence. Repetitious confession, especially in required meetings, often expresses an
arrogance in the name of humility. As Camus wrote: "I practice the profession of
penitence to be able to end up as a judge," and, "The more I accuse myself, the
more I have a right to judge you."
Three further aspects of ideological totalism are
"sacred science," "loading of the language," and the principle of
"doctrine over person." Sacred science is important because a claim of being
scientific is often needed to gain plausibility and influence in the modern age. The
Unification Church is one example of a contemporary tendency to combine dogmatic religious
principles with a claim to special scientific knowledge of human behavior and psychology.
The term loading the language' refers to literalism and a tendency to deify words or
images. A simplified, cliche-ridden language can exert enormous psychological force
reducing every issue in a complicated life to a single set of slogans that are said to
embody the truth as a totality. The principle of doctrine over person' is invoked when
cult members sense a conflict between what they are experiencing and what dogma says they
should experience. The internalized message of the totalistic environment is that one must
negate that personal experience on behalf of the truth of the dogma. Contradictions become
associated with guilt: doubt indicates one's own deficiency or evil.
Perhaps the most significant characteristic of totalistic
movements is what I call "dispensing of existence." Those who have not seen the
light and embraced the truth are wedded to evil, tainted, and therefore in some sense,
usually metaphorical, lack the right to exist. That is one reason why a cult member
threatened with being cast into outer darkness may experience a fear of extinction or
collapse. Under particularly malignant conditions, the dispensing of existence is taken
literally; in the Soviet Union, Nazi Germany, and elsewhere, people were put to death for
alleged doctrinal shortcomings. In the People's Temple mass suicide-murder in Guyana, a
cult leader presided over the literal dispensing of existence by means of a suicidal
mystique he himself had made a central theme in the group's ideology. The totalistic
impulse to draw a sharp line between those who have the right to live and those who do not
is especially dangerous in the nuclear age.
Historical Context
Totalism should always be considered within a specific historical context. A significant
feature of contemporary life is the historical (or psycho historical) dislocation
resulting from a loss of the symbolic structures that organize ritual transitions in the
life cycle, and a decay of belief systems concerning religion, authority, marriage,
family, and death. One function of cults is to provide a group initiation rite for the
transition to early adult life, and the formation of an adult identity outside the family.
Cult members have good reasons for seeing attempts by the larger culture to make such
provisions as hypocritical or confused.
In providing substitute symbols for young people, cults are
both radical and reactionary. They are radical because they suggest rude questions about
middle-class family life and American political and religious values in general. They are
reactionary because they revive pre-modern structures of authority and sometimes establish
fascist patterns of internal organization. Furthermore, in their assault on autonomy and
self-definition some cults reject a liberating historical process that has evolved with
great struggle and pain in the West since the Renaissance. (Cults must be considered
individually in making such judgments. Historical dislocation is one source of what I call
the "protean style." This involves a continuous psychological experimentation
with the self, a capacity for endorsing contradictory ideas at the same time, and a
tendency to change one's ideas, companions and way of life with relative ease. Cults
embody a contrary restricted style,' a flight from experimentation and the confusion of a
protean world. These contraries are related: groups and individuals can embrace a protean
and a restricted style in turn. For instance, the so-called hippie ethos of the 1960s and
1970s has been replaced by the present so-called Yuppie preoccupation with safe jobs and
comfortable incomes. For some people, experimentation with a cult is part of the protean
search.
The imagery of extinction derived from the con temporary
threat of nuclear war influences patterns of totalism and fundamentalism throughout the
world. Nuclear war threatens human continuity itself and impairs the symbols of
immortality. Cults seize upon this threat to provide immortalizing principles of their
own. The cult environment supplies a continuous opportunity for the experience of
transcendence -- a mode of symbolic immortality generally suppressed in advanced
industrial society.
Role of Psychology
Cults raise serious psychological concerns, and there is a place for psychologists and
psychiatrists in understanding and treating cult members. But our powers as mental health
professionals are limited, so we should exercise restraint. When helping a young person
confused about a cult situation, it is important to maintain a personal therapeutic
contract so that one is not working for the cult or for the parents. Totalism begets
totalism. What is called deprogramming includes a continuum from intense dialogue on the
one hand to physical coercion and kidnapping, with thought-reform-like techniques, on the
other. My own position, which I have repeatedly conveyed to parents and others who consult
me, is to oppose coercion at either end of the cult process. Cults are primarily a social
and cultural rather than a psychiatric or legal problem. But psychological professionals
can make important contributions to the public education crucial for dealing with the
problem. With greater knowledge about them, people are less susceptible to deception, and
for that reason some cults have been finding it more difficult to recruit members.
Yet painful moral dilemmas remain. When laws are violated
through fraud or specific harm to recruits, legal intervention is clearly indicated. But
what about situations in which behavior is virtually automatized, language reduced to rote
and cliche, yet the cult member expresses a certain satisfaction or even happiness? We
must continue to seek ways to encourage a social commitment to individual autonomy and
avoid coercion and violence.
Robert Jay Lifton, M.D. is Distinguished Professor
of Psychology and Psychiatry at John Jay College and the Graduate Center of the City
University of New York. His most recent book, written with Erik Markuson, is The
Genocidal Mentality: Nazi Holocaust and Nuclear Threat (New York, Basic Books,
1990) .
This
article was
originally
published in The
Harvard Mental
Health Letter,
Volume 7, Number 8,
February 1981 and
was reprinted with
permission in AFF
News,
Vol. 2, No. 5, 1996.
|