Boston Movement Still Harming
Students
The Boston Church of Christ movement (known also as the
International Churches of Christ) now active on or near college campuses on both sides of
the Atlantic, continues to harm numerous students while causing great concern among
parents and administrators.
At the University of Pennsylvania Council's public forum
session late last fall, Acting Chaplain Fred Guyott rose to introduce the issue, about
which religious organizations on campus were expected to deliberate and advise the
Provost. The Rev. Guyott called for an investigation of reports of what he described as
"behavioral problems in the activities" of the Philadelphia Church of Christ
(GPCC). He said that consultations with campus religious leaders, including CA, Hillel,
and the Newman Center, and with counterparts at other campuses with branches of the Boston
movement (Brown, BU, Columbia, Harvard, and Yale), showed a pattern he characterized as
harassment, but which the elders of the GPCC attributed to zeal.
As a number of Council members sought clarification on the
relationship between this issue and any incursion on freedom of speech, the Rev. Guyott
said that an educational approach could concentrate on specific behaviors that students
and parents have reported as harmful (harassment, persistent phone calls, and visits
within dorms), and that he would observe the line between behavioral and theological
issues in taking this to the advisory bodies. (From the summary of the Public Forum
Session of the University of Pennsylvania Council, ALMANAC, 12/12/95. 5)
A Suicide
The capacity for the Boston Movement to occasion expression of great concern, and coverage
by the press around the country, was revealed once again in September when The
Washington Post published a very lengthy treatment detailing the group's activities
in the D. C. area.
The Post story begins by recounting the tale
of Miguel Antonio Longo, a devout Catholic fresh out of Cornell University, who several
years ago visited his parents' home country, Puerto Rico, where he met a friendly
Christian at an art gallery, and readily accepted an invitation to a Bible study. Two
years later, he hanged himself back in D.C., and his parents blame the International
Churches of Christ.
The parents' explanation of this tragedy repeats what
ex-members, parents and other observers have said, and continue to say, about the typical
effects albeit not fatal of membership on all-too-many who become involved. "When
they kill the mind, kill the soul, it's impossible to prove. But if you are a parent, you
know what he was like before he went in and what he was like after he came out," said
Antonio Longo, Miguel's father. His mother Teresa remembers how much her son, who had
suffered bouts of depression during his senior year in college, had changed as a result of
his sojourn in Puerto Rico. Gone was his sense of humor, his joking demeanor. He only
wanted to talk about Scriptures and his new "family." When she asked him if he
thought fellow church members could love him more than his parents, he said,
"Yes."
But the Post is even-handed. It reports the
story of Joi Buckner, a 22-year-old graduate of American University. After two years of
repelling the advances of local ICC recruiters she was a very good student, deeply
involved in student activities, and a former Miss Washington, D.C. I decided that despite
all this, and close, loving parents, "deep in my heart, I am unhappy . . . Well Joi,
you can give this God thing a try, or you can choose death." She chose the D.C.
Church of Christ, and she says it changed her life giving it meaning and happiness.
Stories like these, of satisfaction with life in the
church, like Joi's, on the one hand, and accounts of alienation from family and friends,
guilt, loss of control of one's life, on the other, are both common. They agree that
members become totally devoted to the life and growth of the church involving an average
of 30 hours a week, and significant tithing which exercises great control over their lives
through Bible-based, small-group study, separation from other, contaminating influences
even as they attend school and are involved in school activities, a system of discipleship
whereby older members closely monitor and guide the activities of their juniors, long
hours of proselytizing, and a puritanical sexual ethic. Current members seem pleased with
the arrangement, spiritually and psychologically secure and happy to be living what they
believe to be a real Christian life. (Many former members two out of three recruits
eventually leave) I believe their personal development was hindered and sidetracked, their
independent spirits broken, and their spiritual needs exploited in the group's milieu. One
may conjecture after reading the Post article, which includes much commentary from
administrators at colleges that have banned the ICC proselytizing, that both views are
correct. (From "Campus Crusaders," by Stephanie Griest, The Washington
Post, 9/3/95, F1, F4, F5)
|