Please see our new site, www.icsahome.com which has new material and a more helpful structure.

 

NEW! International Cultic Studies Association site has moved - click here

  Conferences | Donate  

 >  
ICSA resources about psychological manipulation, cultic groups, sects, and new religious movements.

 

 
 
 

Article

Our E-Library contains full text articles and other resources related to the information below.  Click here.

WHY WE USE SYMBOLS/ICONS IN OUR LISTS.

Please note:

ICSA does NOT maintain a list of "bad" groups or "cults."  We nonjudgmentally list groups on which we have information.

Groups listed, described, or referred to on ICSA's Web sites may be mainstream or nonmainstream, controversial or noncontroversial, religious or nonreligious, cult or not cult, harmful or benign.

We encourage inquirers to consider a variety of opinions, negative and positive, so that inquirers can make independent and informed judgments pertinent to their particular concerns.

Views expressed on our Web sites are those of the document's author(s) and are not necessarily shared, endorsed, or recommended by ICSA or any of its directors, staff, or advisors.

See:  Definitional Issues Collection; Understanding Groups Collection

Views expressed on our Web sites are those of the document's author(s) and are not necessarily shared, endorsed, or recommended by ICSA or any of its directors, staff, or advisors

Unlikely Events -- And Coincidence

 

Newspapers frequently run stories of the following kind: a man lost his University of Virginia class ring while sailing off the Carolina coast. He reached up to halt the swing of a boom, and accidentally sent his ring flying off into the sea, where it sank in about 30 feet of water. A year and a half later, another man was talking to a friend in an alley behind a restaurant in Charlottesville, Virginia, when a bright glint in some trash from the restaurant caught his eye. Investigating, he found a class ring, and from the inscription was able to locate the man who had originally lost the ring and return it to him. The two men assumed, after comparing stories, that the ring was swallowed by a fish which was later caught and sold to the restaurant, then discarded unseen in the waste from the preparation of the fish for a dinner. Of course, many  other explanations are possible, but it is not important for the present discussion just HOW the lost ring made its way from the sea to an alley behind a restaurant. Whatever happened involved many remarkable coincidences or did it?

Another news item reported how two women had met in a Tulsa, Oklahoma hospital two years ago when they had given birth to daughters about an hour apart. Even though they had solemnly vowed to keep in touch, they had not seen or spoken to one another since -- until they found themselves back in the same hospital, both having given birth to sons, this time about four hours apart.

One sometimes reads about the bridge player who receives a 13-card hand consisting of all the spades. By chance, such a hand should be dealt only once in 635,013,559,600 times! Incredible, right?

All experience reported by many people is that of traveling to a distant city only to encounter a friend or acquaintance from back home, on the street or in a store or some other public place. The event seems even more remarkable when we consider how easily it could NOT have taken place. Had either of the two friends decided to go to Museum X instead of Museum Y, or taken an earlier bus, or overslept, or taken longer for lunch, or gotten on a different elevator, or any of hundreds of alternatives presented in the course of daily events that preceded the encounter, the event would never have happened and the two people would never have realized that they were both in the same remote city at the same time.

Perhaps most of the people who have, or read about, such experiences accept them as being very unlikely, very uncommon, but not otherwise unusual. Most people seem to feel no need to appeal to supernatural explanations for these events. But we frequently encounter in pseudoscience the claim that such events are in fact miraculous, and that some mysterious force or influence is required to bring about the event at all. Instead of accepting such events as normal events of low probability, there are in fact international organizations devoted to the collection, preservation, and dissemination of examples of such "strange" occurrences, which the organization find highly significant, mysterious, and certainly NOT due to "mere coincidence." Often the examples are rendered more dramatic than otherwise by involving some famous person or media personality, or being part of some famous event in history. Here are some instances from an article in the January 1982 issue of Science Digest.

  • British novelist Dame Rebecca West was writing a story in which a girl finds a hedgehog in her garden. Just as West finished this passage, she was interrupted by servants who informed her they had just found a hedgehog in her garden.

  • When Norman Mailer began his novel Barbary Shore, there was no plan to have a Russian spy as a character.   As he worked on it, he introduced a Russian spy in the U.S. as a minor character. As the work progressed, the spy became the dominant character in the novel. After the novel was completed, the U.S. Immigration Service arrested a man who lived just one floor above Mailer in the same apartment building. He was Colonel Rudolf Abel, alleged to be the top Russian spy working in the U.S. at that time.

  • While the Allied Forces were planning the Normandy invasion of June 6, 1944, the following code words were used (and were among the best kept secrets of the war): Utah and Omaha for the beaches where the landing would take place; Mulberry, for the artificial harbor which would be put in place after the landing; Neptune, the overall plan for Naval operations; Overlord the entire planned invasion itself. On May 3, 1944, the first code word, Utah, appeared as an answer in the London Daily Telegraph crossword puzzle; on May 23, Omaha appeared similarly; on May 31 Mulberry appeared; and on June 2, four days before the invasion, Neptune and Overlord both appeared. British Intelligence investigated intensively and extensively, but the man who had created the puzzles was found to be innocent of espionage, had no knowledge of any invasion plans, and to all intents and purposes had chosen the words at random.

There is no question that unusual events of this kind happen, and it is easy to imagine how dramatic and impressive they must have seemed to the people who were involved. When something happens that is perceived by those involved to be dramatic or unexpected, there is a tendency to look for equally "dramatic" causes for the event.  That such an event is due to "mere coincidence" is usually dismissed at once as a possibility. People tend to look for something impressive, a supernatural or "psychic" or religious explanation for the event. Psychologists call this the "Oh, Wow!" Syndrome.

But just how remarkable are these events? Is the hedgehog experience of Dame West more or less remarkable than the meeting of the two women in the hospital twice on occasions two years apart? Are the odds of a spy living near you at the time you decide to write a novel involving a spy that much different from the odds of being dealt a bridge hand with 13 spades? Is it less likely that Utah, Omaha, Mulberry and two other common words would be used in a crossword puzzle just at the time a secret military operation has given them a secret significance, than that the sailor would get his class ring back a year and a half after losing it in the ocean?

Take the 13-spade bridge hand, where it is simple to calculate the odds. With 20 million bridge players dealing 30 hands a week, we should get one all-spade hand per 20 years. In fact, as bridge expert Oswald Jacoby pointed out, such hands are reported much more frequently, perhaps a dozen times per year. An obvious explanation, easily verified on several occasions, is that one or more players conspire to play a practical joke on the other players by simply stacking the deck. It is a harmless way to get your name and photograph in the newspapers. If two people in the same profession, who routinely must travel from Austin to New York several times per year on business, were to happen to meet in the airport or in a familiar hotel, we would hardly consider this as unusual. Yet it is not so much more unusual for two elderly friends to decide to take a vacation in Washington, D.C., in May to see the cherry blossoms, independently, and to run into one another by chance at one of the places every tourist visits while in Washington. Again, if hedgehogs are fairly common in English gardens, it is not too surprising that Dame West was writing about finding one and that in fact one was found in her garden. Again, if both of the women in Tulsa were married to men in the oil business, who are regularly separated from their wives for many months while they work in overseas oil fields, then our view of the probability of both women being in the maternity ward at the same time is greatly changed. Generally, people tend to underestimate grossly the probability of any event that happens to them, especially one perceived at "strange."

Pseudoscientists frequently take advantage of this inability of people to understand the nature of coincidence. Thus coincidences that are hardly remarkable are passed off as "miracles" that can only be explained by ESP, intervention by benevolent Space Brothers or guardian angels, etc. The failure to understand the odds is particularly noticeable when one hears about feats of alleged psychics, fortunetellers, astrologers, and others who claim to foresee future events.

Pseudoscientific predictors tend to stress the time or two they made a really spectacular correct "prediction" -- for some reason we don't hear about the thousand other "predictions" made by them during the same time period, that didn't quite pan out. Recall the fable about the boy who cried wolf; eventually he was correct, but he had given so many false alarms prior to that time that the villagers didn't respond to the valid warning. For some reason, many people in our society do not recognize the parallel between the boy in this fable and the alleged "psychics," who are allowed to get away with being wrong nearly all the time, and still are taken seriously on the rare occasions they happen to be correct.

Let's take an example. Suppose you try to guess every time the telephone rings who is calling before picking up the receiver. Inevitably you will be correct if you guess often enough, just by chance. The usual practice is to remember and talk about only the times when you were correct; but if you keep track of the misses as well as the hits, you will see that the correct guesses are no more frequent than sheer chance would imply. If we consider the hundreds of thousands of stories that are written by Dame West, Norman Mailer, and other thousands of active writers being published over the years, we soon realize that by accident some incident described in one of these stories will eventually prove to have parallels in real life. It simply has to be that way. The remarkable thing would be if none of those plausible incidents described by writers ever happened!

The point is that each moment of each day of even the most ordinary, humdrum life of an individual is filled with events, and each of those events, no matter how ordinary, is quite improbably. It is very improbable that just as I sit down to type something, a student comes into my office to ask me something. But I sit down to type very frequently, and students come into my office very frequently, so it's bound to happen sometimes. Only if every time I sat down to type, a student came into my office, would something miraculous be happening. Once this is appreciated for the events of our own humble lives, it should be clear that it must pertain for the lives of famous and important people as well. A "strange" event happening to a famous person, or at a crucial moment in history, is no more or less strange than a similar event happening to you in the bathtub tonight.

What would be paranormal, what would be miraculous, what would be unexplainable, would be if NO SUCH coincidence or unlikely accidents or "strange" events every happened to anyone.

Further Reading

How to Take a Chance, by Darrell Huff and Irving Geis, Norton, New York, 1959

Lady Luck, by Warren Weaver, Anchor Press, New York, 1965; Dover, New York, 1982; see especially chapter 13, "Rare Events, Coincidences and Surprising Occurrences."

Acknowledgments

ASTOP -- The Austin Society to Oppose Pseudoscience -- has prepared fact sheets on various topics for the benefit of teachers and others interested in promoting critical thinking. Dr. Dennis McFadden, Professor of Psychology at the University of Texas at Austin, is the author of this fact sheet. The International Cultic Studies Association (formerly American Family Foundation), a professional research and educational organization concerned about the harmful effects of cultic and related  involvements, prints and helps distribute these fact sheets. Because ASTOP fact sheets seek to stimulate critical thinking, rather than advance a particular point of view, opinions expressed are those of the authors.   These fact sheets may be copied for educational purposes, but they may not be reproduced for resale.

 

_

 

Resources

Astop: "Fact Sheet Ancient Astronauts"
Astop: "Fact Sheet Astrology"
Astop: "Fact Sheet Distinguishing Science and Pseudoscience"
Astop: "Fact Sheet Extrasensory Perception -- Telepathy"
Astop: "Fact Sheet Extrasensory Perception"
Astop: "Fact Sheet Fortean Fallacy"
Astop: "Fact Sheet Ghosts"
Astop: "Fact Sheet Kirlean Photography"
Astop: "Fact Sheet Modern Visitors"
Astop: "Fact Sheet Monsters"
Astop: "Fact Sheet Mystical Physics"
Astop: "Fact Sheet Predicting the Future"
Astop: "Fact Sheet Psychic Detectives"
Astop: "Fact Sheet Reincarnation, Life after Death, Astral Travel"
Astop: "Fact Sheet Spiritualism"
Astop: "Fact Sheet Unlikely Events -- And Coincidence"

 

 

 

________________________________________________________ ^ 

 
 
  
  

Related

http://www.culticstudies.org/_dwt_banner/banner_index.htm

_dwt_header_related_links_line03

Academic Disputes and Dialogue
children
clergy
conversion
cults101
Custody/Forensic
dissociation
educators
false memory
family
former member
free info
intervention
large group awareness trainings
legal
mental health
press
pseudoscience
research
students
thought reform
understanding groups

_________________________________________________________ ^

Help

Our E-Library contains full text articles and other resources related to the information below.  Click here.

WHY WE USE SYMBOLS/ICONS IN OUR LISTS.

Please note:

ICSA does NOT maintain a list of "bad" groups or "cults."  We nonjudgmentally list groups on which we have information.

Groups listed, described, or referred to on ICSA's Web sites may be mainstream or nonmainstream, controversial or noncontroversial, religious or nonreligious, cult or not cult, harmful or benign.

We encourage inquirers to consider a variety of opinions, negative and positive, so that inquirers can make independent and informed judgments pertinent to their particular concerns.

Views expressed on our Web sites are those of the document's author(s) and are not necessarily shared, endorsed, or recommended by ICSA or any of its directors, staff, or advisors.

See:  Definitional Issues Collection; Understanding Groups Collection
 

Views expressed on our Web sites are those of the document's author(s) and are not necessarily shared, endorsed, or recommended by ICSA or any of its directors, staff, or advisors.

Help index

WHY WE USE SYMBOLS/ICONS IN OUR LISTS.

ICSA/AFF - about

ICSA - contact

announcement

 article
 article abstract

Ξ book/video review

links
events

groups

? help

* index
news
products

   press

> profiles

resource org

study resources

topic ●▫∞▪Θ

_________________________________________________________ ^

 
About ICSA | Contact US  | Profiles | links

   | webmaster | search

Copyright 1997-2008 ICSA, Inc.