Modern Visitors From Other Worlds
One of the best known of all pseudoscientific claims is that
the planet earth is presently being visited by spacecraft from some other
world. Various kinds of “evidence” are presented to back up this claim. First,
it is claimed, thousands of people have seen things in the sky, which they
could not identify or recognize. Second, several hundred people (called
“contactees”) claim to have personally gone inside spacecraft and to have
conversed with or to have been examined by the alien occupants; they offer no
proof but their own testimony. Since neither reports of strange lights in the
sky nor tall tales by strange people constitute valid evidence of anything,
believers in this particular pseudoscience are also fond of claiming that “the
government” has all the valid evidence but keeps it “top secret.” Sometimes it
even is claimed that the government has hidden away crashed spaceships and the
bodies of the occupants, or that the government itself has been “taken over” by
aliens from another world.
Let us look at these claims in more detail. More than 90% of
all sightings of “unidentified flying objects” are sightings of lights in the
night sky. Furthermore, those reporting the sightings are not amateur
astronomers or other people in the habit of scanning the sky every night, thus
becoming familiar with what is there. Instead, they are people who have read
about “flying saucers” in a newspaper, magazine, or book, or have heard about
them on radio and T.V. Such people, on impulse, go out and look at the night
sky — perhaps for the first time in years — and the first “unusual” thing they
see becomes a flying saucer. Sometimes what is seen is described so
inaccurately or vaguely that it is impossible to discover what the observer actually
saw. But when it is possible to visit the scene and question the witnesses, a
trained investigator can easily identify up to 95% of all sighted flying
saucers as conventional objects. Sources of nocturnal lights which have given
rise to such sightings include: planets
(especially Mars and Venus) and bright stars (30% of all cases); advertising
planes (20% of all cases); commercial and military aircraft (18%); bright
meteors, meteor fireballs, and satellite re-entries (10%). Daylight reports of
flying saucers are much rarer; they are almost always due to aircraft or
weather balloons. Evidence that such sightings are due simply to the focusing
of public interest on the sky (rather than being due to what is actually
present in the sky) is provided by the so-called “Saucer Flaps,” periods when
large numbers of reports come in within a very short time. (The reports stir
more people to go out and look; the more people that look, the more reports
that come in.)
The first flap occurred in the summer of 1947, after
extensive newspaper publicity concerning the very first of all flying saucer
sightings, by Kenneth Arnold near Mt. Rainier in June. The second and largest
of all flaps occurred in the summer of 1952 following a Life magazine
article (April 1952), which heavily favored the hypothesis that flying saucers
were spacecraft from another world. Other flaps occurred in the fall and winter
of 1957 (after the Russians launched the first earth satellite, Sputnik I);
1965-66, a period when there was a very heavy, almost continuous media
publicity concerning flying saucers and contacted claims, the fall of 1969
(after the first manned moon landing); August 1973 (after a T.V. show about von
Daniken’s “ancient astronauts”); and the summer of 1979 (another wave of media
publicity). Sightings of flying saucers dropped to almost nothing during most
of the period 1968-70, when the U.S. was deeply divided internally over the
conduct of the war in Vietnam. The U.S. Air Force, which had routinely
investigated sightings since 1947, took advantage of this lull to terminate its
Project Blue Book and officially abandoned all interest in flying saucers.
During the official investigation of flying saucer
sightings, there were three independent reviews of all the most impressive
sightings to that date by panels of distinguished scientists. The first was the
“Robertson Panel” in 1953. The second was a scientific review of Project Blue
Book in March 1966. The third and last was the Condon Study conducted at the
University of Colorado in 1968. There have been several other unofficial
scientific studies of flying saucer reports, including a symposium sponsored by
the American Association for the Advancement of Science in December 1969. All
such studies have come to the same fairly obvious conclusion: there is not a shred, not the tiniest
fragment, of hard physical evidence that the planet earth has ever been visited
by a vehicle or other spacecraft manufactured on another world or piloted by
creatures from another world.
Since the fall of 1966, aviation and space writer Philip J.
Klass has had a standing offer of $10,000 to anyone who can provide any
meaningful evidence that the earth has been or is being visited by alien
spacecraft; he still has his money. Tabloid newspapers such as the National
Enquirer have made similar offers; no evidence has come forth. Could it be
that no evidence exists?
It should be stressed that scientists find nothing
offensive, disturbing, or impossible about the idea of visitors from other
planets. In fact, it is scientists who have done the most to convince the
general public that such a thing is possible. But there is a big difference
between something being possible and something actually taking place!
Scientists must point out that there is no evidence whatsoever that such visits
have ever happened.
The “contactees” (people claiming to have met and talked to
alien visitors) are perhaps more baffling than lights in the night sky, but
perhaps less baffling when one sees how their bank balances increase after
their claims are publicized. The first and best known of all contactees, George
Adamski, went from being a dishwasher in a hamburger stand to millionaire
status within a few years of the publication of his first book of “revelations”
gleaned from telepathic conversations with “Masters of Wisdom” from Venus and
Saturn. Adamski’s first score (or so) of imitators have had varying degrees of
success. The better-known ones such as Betty Hill have also become quite
wealthy from sales of books based on their “experiences.” None of these people
offer any evidence that their reported experiences ever took place.
Reports of crashed flying saucers, to date, have all been
hoaxes. The earliest, from which all the others are simply rewritten, was a
hoax perpetrated on show business writer Frank Scully by two con men who were
trying to drum up business for their oil-drilling scam, in the course of which
they bilked hundreds of thousands of dollars out of farmers and ranchers all
over the Southwest, and who were ultimately sent to prison. (Their oil-finding
“equipment” was supposedly from the crashed saucer!)
Many photographs and even movies of alleged “flying saucers”
exist. A few show obvious natural phenomena:
a milling flock of seagulls, the rising moon, and distant aircraft. The
majority, however, display images that could readily have been fabricated by a
10-year-old child (and in some cases were fabricated by 10-year-old
children!). There is not a single photograph from all the thousands of
sightings of unidentified flying objects since 1947 that provides evidence that
anyone has photographed any actual flying object not previously known to
science.
Claims that real evidence does exist, but is kept top
secret, cannot be taken seriously. How can anyone believe that a government
agency could have successfully kept such a secret for 40 years — through eight
different presidential administrations? Jimmy Carter, in particular, was a firm
“believer” in flying saucers, but he found no evidence in the archives of any
governmental agency — open or secret — to support his beliefs. Could it be that
no such evidence exists?
The idea that the earth is now being visited by wise and
benevolent beings from other worlds is a very attractive one; it is a
pseudoscientific rewrite of the ancient religious theme of intervention by gods
in human affairs. It is an attractive and not impossible idea, but it is not a
fact.
THE FATE OF SOME OF THE
“BEST” UFO REPORTS, FREQUENTLY MENTIONED IN UFO BOOKS
|
DATE
|
CASE NAME
|
ALLEGED EVENTS
|
CONCLUSION AFTER STUDY
|
|
1/7/1948
|
Godman AFB, Kentucky
|
Pilot Mantell chased UFO, got too close, plane crashed.
|
UFO was Skyhook balloon, then secret. Mantell flew too
high without oxygen.5,6,7
|
|
7/24/48
|
Eastern Airlines; Georgia
|
Pilots Chiles & Whitted saw cigar-shape with windows pass
near their airliner.
|
Descriptions match that given by witnesses to re-entry of
Zond IV in 1968; C & W saw meteor. 2,6
|
|
10/1/48
|
Fargo, North Dakota
|
Pilot Gorman has dogfight with lit UFO at night.
|
All events duplicated by having pilots chase lighted balloon.5,7
|
|
3/17/50
|
Farmington, New Mexico
|
Hundreds of tumbling UFOs drift by many witnesses.
|
Observers saw blowing fragments of disintegrated Skyhook
balloon.3,7
|
|
5/11/50
|
McMinnville, Oregon
|
Mr. & Mrs. Trent photograph saucer-shape over
backyard.
|
Fabricated model; story of event contains inconsistencies.1,6
|
|
7/2/52
|
Tremonton, Utah
|
Navy photographer Newhouse gets telephoto movies of
“milling UFOs.”
|
Identified as birds; similar behavior of birds readily
observable any time in this area.6
|
|
Sept. 1957
|
Ubatuba, Brazil
|
Saucer seen to explode, fragments recovered, found of
“nonterrestrial origin.”
|
Hoax; fragments match samples readily available from Dow
Chemical.6
|
|
12/5/63
|
Vandenberg AFB, California
|
Rocket-tracking cameras photograph UFO.
|
UFO was planet Venus, readily visible through a telescope
in daylight.6
|
|
8/3/65
|
Santa Ana, California
|
Traffic investigator Rex Heflin photographs saucer.
|
Obvious hoax. UFO suspended from string just outside truck
window.6
|
|
Sept. 1965
|
Exeter, New Hampshire
|
Many citizens see hovering silvery object(s).
|
UFO was planet Jupiter.1
|
|
Dec.-Jan. 1978
|
New Zealand
|
T.V. news people film intensely-lit UFO.
|
UFOs filmed included ground lights, brilliantly lit boats
of Japanese squid-fishing fleet, and planet Venus.1
|
|
Late Aug. 1984
|
Brewster, New York
|
Huge objects seen, V-shaped or circular, bearing many
green, red and white lights.
|
Deliberate Hoax by Stormville, New York, private pilots
flying in extremely close formation.10
|
References for further reading
1.
The UFO Verdict: Examining the Evidence, Robert Sheaffer,
Prometheus, New York, 1979.
2.
UFOs Explained, Philip J. Klass, Random House, New York, 1974.
3.
The UFO Handbook, Allan Hendry,
Doubleday, New York, 1979.
4.
UFOs, A Scientific Debate, Ed. by
Carl Sagan and Thornton Page, Cornell, New York, 1972.
5.
The World of Flying Saucers, D.H.
Menzel and L.G. Boyd, Doubleday, New York, 1963.
6.
Scientific Study of Unidentified Flying
Objects (The Condon Report), Bantam, New York, 1969.
7.
Report on Unidentified Flying Objects, E.
J. Ruppelt, Doubleday, New York, 1959.
8.
“Flying Saucers 30 Years On,” Ian Ridpath, New
Scientist, July 14, 1977.
9.
“The Failure of the Science of UFOlogy,”
James Oberg, New Scientist, October 11, 1979.
10.
“The Great Hudson Valley UFO Mystery,” Glenn
Garlik, Discover, November 1984, pp. 18-24.
Acknowledgments
ASTOP – The Austin Society to Oppose Pseudoscience – has
prepared fact sheets on various pseudoscience topics for the benefit of
teachers and others interested in promoting critical thinking. Dr. Rory Coker,
Professor of Physics at the University of Texas at Austin, is the author of
this fact sheet. The International Cultic Studies Association (formerly American Family Foundation), a professional research and
educational organization concerned about the harmful effects of cultic and
related
involvements, prints and helps distribute these fact sheets. Because ASTOP fact
sheets seek to stimulate critical thinking, rather than advance a particular
point of view, opinions expressed are those of the authors. These fact sheets
may be copied for educational purposes, but they may not be reproduced for
resale.